← All rankings
💻 Coding
AI model rankings by coding capability — LiveCodeBench, SciCode, Terminal-Bench.
100/100 models
| # | Access | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Anthropic | 99.3 | Try now | |
| 2 | OpenAI | 94.8 | Try now | |
| 3 | Anthropic | 94.8 | Try now | |
| 4 | OpenAI | 94.6 | Try now | |
| 5 | Meta | 94.0 | Try now | |
| 6 | SpaceXAI | 93.9 | – | |
| 7 | Google | 93.8 | Try now | |
| 8 | Alibaba | 93.7 | Try now | |
| 9 | Google | 93.2 | Try now | |
| 10 | OpenAI | 93.1 | Try now | |
| 11 | Kimi | 92.7 | Try now | |
| 12 | Anthropic | 92.3 | Try now | |
| 13 | Z AI | 91.9 | Try now | |
| 14 | Alibaba | 90.3 | Try now | |
| 15 | Anthropic | 89.7 | Try now | |
| 16 | OpenAI | 89.7 | Try now | |
| 17 | Meta | 88.9 | Try now | |
| 18 | Alibaba | 88.7 | Try now | |
| 19 | Z AI | 88.6 | Try now | |
| 20 | SpaceXAI | 88.6 | Try now | |
| 21 | Anthropic | 88.2 | Try now | |
| 22 | OpenAI | 87.5 | Try now | |
| 23 | Anthropic | 87.5 | Try now | |
| 24 | Meta | 87.4 | Try now | |
| 25 | DeepSeek | 85.6 | Try now | |
| 26 | DeepSeek | 85.5 | Try now | |
| 27 | Google | 85.5 | Try now | |
| 28 | Google | 85.1 | Try now | |
| 29 | Alibaba | 84.8 | Try now | |
| 30 | OpenAI | 84.7 | Try now | |
| 31 | Z AI | 84.3 | Try now | |
| 32 | Google | 82.0 | Try now | |
| 33 | DeepSeek | 81.7 | Try now | |
| 34 | Alibaba | 80.8 | Try now | |
| 35 | Motif Technologies | 79.9 | – | |
| 36 | Institute of Foundation Models | 78.2 | – | |
| 37 | Multiverse Computing | 77.5 | – | |
| 38 | Apodex | 77.4 | – | |
| 39 | Anthropic | 75.9 | Try now | |
| 40 | Kimi | 75.8 | Try now | |
| 41 | Kimi | 75.8 | Try now | |
| 42 | Tencent | 74.2 | – | |
| 43 | Xiaomi | 74.2 | – | |
| 44 | Nex AGI | 73.9 | – | |
| 45 | InclusionAI | 73.7 | – | |
| 46 | DeepSeek | 73.4 | Try now | |
| 47 | MiniMax | 73.3 | Try now | |
| 48 | KwaiKAT | 72.9 | – | |
| 49 | Meta | 72.2 | Try now | |
| 50 | InclusionAI | 72.2 | – | |
| 51 | Xiaomi | 70.6 | – | |
| 52 | Alibaba | 70.5 | Try now | |
| 53 | DeepSeek | 70.0 | Try now | |
| 54 | Z AI | 69.3 | Try now | |
| 55 | OpenAI | 69.2 | Try now | |
| 56 | OpenAI | 69.2 | Try now | |
| 57 | Thinking Machines | 68.5 | – | |
| 58 | Upstage | 68.4 | – | |
| 59 | Alibaba | 67.8 | Try now | |
| 60 | China Mobile | 67.6 | – | |
| 61 | Alibaba | 67.4 | Try now | |
| 62 | Thinking Machines | 67.4 | – | |
| 63 | InclusionAI | 66.2 | – | |
| 64 | SpaceXAI | 66.2 | – | |
| 65 | MiniMax | 65.5 | Try now | |
| 66 | Meta | 64.6 | Try now | |
| 67 | Google | 64.5 | Try now | |
| 68 | 63.6 | Try now | ||
| 69 | Anthropic | 61.6 | Try now | |
| 70 | Xiaomi | 60.7 | Try now | |
| 71 | Upstage | 60.5 | – | |
| 72 | Mistral | 60.4 | Try now | |
| 73 | Alibaba | 60.3 | Try now | |
| 74 | LongCat | 59.9 | – | |
| 75 | OpenAI | 59.7 | Try now | |
| 76 | Kimi | 58.4 | Try now | |
| 77 | Alibaba | 57.8 | Try now | |
| 78 | InclusionAI | 56.2 | – | |
| 79 | Google | 56.1 | Try now | |
| 80 | Z AI | 56.1 | Try now | |
| 81 | LG AI Research | 55.8 | – | |
| 82 | SpaceXAI | 55.4 | – | |
| 83 | Z AI | 55.0 | Try now | |
| 84 | Alibaba | 54.9 | Try now | |
| 85 | DeepSeek | 54.5 | Try now | |
| 86 | Institute of Foundation Models | 54.2 | – | |
| 87 | SK Telecom | 54.0 | – | |
| 88 | OpenAI | 53.6 | Try now | |
| 89 | Google | 53.6 | Try now | |
| 90 | StepFun | 53.3 | Try now | |
| 91 | Anthropic | 53.3 | Try now | |
| 92 | DeepSeek | 52.4 | Try now | |
| 93 | Google | 51.8 | Try now | |
| 94 | Cohere | 50.3 | Try now | |
| 95 | 49.7 | Try now | ||
| 96 | Alibaba | 48.7 | Try now | |
| 97 | AI9Stars | 48.1 | – | |
| 98 | Alibaba | 47.4 | Try now | |
| 99 | Google | 46.4 | Try now | |
| 100 | OpenAI | 46.2 | Try now |
How scores work — AIM Index
● Capability 85%● Recency 15%
SWE-bench VerifiedAider PolyglotLiveCodeBench
Data sources (1)