AI RACE— The AI Race
Business

Federal Judge Dismisses Publisher Antitrust Lawsuits Over Google’s AI Overviews

U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta tossed out antitrust claims from Chegg and Penske Media Corporation, ruling that an expectation of web traffic does not constitute an illegal anticompetitive agreement.

10/02/2026, 00:12
Tòa án Mỹ bác đơn kiện chống độc quyền nhắm vào tính năng Google AI Overviews

Federal Court Throws Out AI Overviews Antitrust Claims

A federal judge has dismissed a pair of antitrust lawsuits brought against Google by online education company Chegg and Penske Media Corporation (PMC), the parent company of Rolling Stone. The complaints, initially filed last year, accused the tech giant of weaponizing its search dominance to siphon visitor traffic away from original web sources through its AI-driven search features. On Wednesday, U.S. District Judge Amit Mehta ruled in Google’s favor, holding that the claims brought by Chegg and PMC do not meet the legal threshold required by antitrust law.

'An Expectation Is Not an Agreement'

In the original lawsuits, Chegg and PMC claimed Google abused its monopoly position by compelling digital publishers to provide their material to AI Overviews without compensation. The plaintiffs alleged that websites faced an untenable choice: allow Google to use their proprietary text for generative search summaries at no cost, or risk complete exclusion from search index results. The publishers argued that this mechanism diverted audiences directly away from third-party sites, causing severe drops in advertising and subscription revenues.

Judge Mehta, who previously issued a landmark antitrust ruling against Google in 2024, disagreed with the plaintiffs' legal premise. In his ruling, Mehta determined that the publishers merely relied on the historical operations of web indexing. "Plaintiffs have pleaded only that they have an ‘expectation’ that Google will send them search traffic if they make their content available for free," Mehta wrote. "But an expectation is not an agreement. It is simply how a general search engine works."

While Mehta acknowledged the court is not "unsympathetic to the situation publishers now find themselves in," he explained that antitrust enforcement cannot be bent to substitute for legislative action regarding the economic upheaval created by "new innovation."

Plummeting Referral Traffic and Emerging Publisher Deals

The decision lands as content creators, small blogs, and large news publishers continue to weather steep declines in referral traffic triggered by Google’s transition to generative answers atop its search interface. In an apparent effort to address growing industry friction, Google has started testing financial arrangements with selected media partners. According to a recent report from The Information, Google is currently conducting a pilot initiative that pays roughly 100 publishers for contributions tapped by Gemini, AI Mode, and AI Overviews.

◗ Sources

The Verge10/02

Related stories